Nervous System Reactions At A Glance:

  • Latest VAERS numbers show 927,738 vaccine reactions to COVID vaccines.
  • Europe’s EudraVigilance reporting system shows 1,228,780 vaccine reactions to COVID vaccines.
  • Pfizer responsible for 49.4% of all COVID vaccine reactions among 4 used in Europe.
  • Nervous system disorders far surpass any myocarditis concerns; not given a warning.

VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) is one of the systems in the US used to monitor adverse events related to vaccines. According to the Health and Human Services website:

Established in 1990, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a national early warning system to detect possible safety problems in U.S.-licensed vaccines. VAERS is co-managed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).1

Before the COVID vaccines were released, vaccine supporters would frequently point to VAERS as a reputable, robust, and reliable source of vaccine related reactions. However, people with concerns regarding vaccines and vaccine injury were concerned the data seriously under-represented the problem.

According to a Harvard study:

Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.2

Keeping in mind that less than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported as stated above, the numbers should be alarming. As of November 26, the latest data released, VAERS reports 927,738 adverse events to the COVID vaccines alone. To put this into context, the total number of adverse events reported from 1990 through the data released on November 27, 2021, was 1,782,451 for all other vaccines combined. That means that in 11 months, the COVID vaccines shadowed the 854,713 other reactions reported in 31 years.3 These numbers only represent the US. In fact, VAERS is only one of several reporting systems used in the US. Getting a clear picture of the injuries is indeed, challenging.

Vaccine Reactions in Europe

Europe uses EudraVigilance. In fact, the system is quite a bit easier to navigate and breakdown information than the US’s VAERS. In the EudraVigilance system, each vaccine brand is listed separately with charts and graphs to clearly represent the data for the particular product.

At the time of publication, the numbers below represent adverse events for each brand. Please note, since the Pfizer drug has been approved, it is now marketed under the brand name Tozinameran. This data was released through December 4, 2021:

A chart and table showing Pfizer COVID vaccine reactions in Europe

A chart and graph showing COVID vaccine reactions Moderna in Europe

a chart and graph showing hte vaccine reactions for Janssen COVID vaccine in Europe

chart and graph showing vaccine reaction to Astrazeneca COVID vaccine in Europe

The total number of reactions reported to the Eudravigilance site for these COVID vaccines is 1,228,780. There are only 14,214 more reactions for Moderna, Astrazeneca, and Janssen combined over the Pfizer product. That means 49.4% of all reactions are due to the Pfizer shot.

Moderna Vaccine Reactions and Myocarditis

Recently, several European countries began limiting who received the Moderna vaccine after concerns of myocarditis and pericarditis were raised. A warning label has been issued for myocarditis and pericarditis for both of the mRNA products, however Pfizer hasn’t been restricted for use in relation to myocarditis. When looking at the numbers in the US, it is clear that there are more cases associated with the Pfizer vaccine than with Moderna.

A pie graph showing the number of myocarditis cases by COVID vaccine brand

Myocarditis and Blood Clots Pale in Comparison to Nervous System Disorders

In looking at the data, it is clear and easy to see that myocarditis, pericarditis, and blood clots are minimal in comparison to another systemic reaction. Nervous system disorders rank higher than either of the above concerns that have warranted warning labels and restrictions. In the 18-64 age range alone, there are 182,581 cases of nervous system disorders. The total number of nervous system disorders, according to EudraVigilance, is  646,723. Compare that to the 13,650 total cases of all cardiac events with the Moderna vaccine that warranted caution for the specific under 30 age group for myo- and pericarditis.

According to Johns Hopkins:

Disorders of the nervous system may involve the following:

Vascular disorders, such as stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural hemorrhage and hematoma, and extradural hemorrhage

Infections, such as meningitis, encephalitis, polio, and epidural abscess

Structural disorders, such as brain or spinal cord injury, Bell’s palsy, cervical spondylosis, carpal tunnel syndrome, brain or spinal cord tumors, peripheral neuropathy, and Guillain-Barré syndrome

Functional disorders, such as headache, epilepsy, dizziness, and neuralgia

Degeneration, such as Parkinson disease, multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Huntington chorea, and Alzheimer disease4

The EudraVigilance system allows us to look at nervous system disorders in relation to other reactions by each of the manufacturers:

Astrazeneca Nervous system reactions COVID vaccine

A chart showing reactions by type for Janssen vaccine in Europe

vaccine reactions by type Moderna COVID vaccine Europe

Reactions to Pfizer covid vaccine by type

Hold the Phone — Doc’s Thoughts:

These numbers are alarming! How have these clearly dangerous, clearly failing shots even still allowed in any country that considers itself civilized? This is most certainly one of the most heinous crimes against humanity. The health agencies that have endorsed, approved, and recommend these products all have blood on their hands. Shame on them.

Did you do the math? Did you add the numbers from the US and Europe together? We’re looking at over 2 million reactions in just the US and Europe alone. What in the world?! This is just a fraction of the global population that has been subjected to this pharmaceutical. What product anywhere in the world wouldn’t be under criminal investigation? And what government that approved and endorsed it wouldn’t be also? This is ridiculous!

Myocarditis and pericarditis are certainly concerning. Any practitioner that would tell you that myocarditis and pericarditis are mild is either lying or doesn’t understand the condition. The heart tissue isn’t replaced with new, healthy, heart tissue. It’s replaced with scar tissue. We don’t know the lifelong effects of this condition in relation to these vaccines. But we do know that it has killed people, young, healthy people, including those in the military and athletes.

But let’s look at those nervous system disorders! Why are those not raising concerns? We’ve heard of the blood clots, the myocarditis, and pericarditis. But the nervous system? We only hear about those when the vaccine injured are allowed to speak. Those numbers should be ringing alarms all over the world. The cardiac issues look like mole hills compared to that mountain. Why stop with nervous system? There are plenty of other conditions on those charts musculoskeletal and connective tissue, gastrointestinal, and others that barely get a mention in the media.

These are young, young people! Nervous system disorders affect the whole body. That’s what the nervous system does; controls the whole body. Did you read the list above from Johns Hopkins? Those aren’t little concerns. Those are lifelong, sometimes life-threatening, often to always life-changing issues!

It is no wonder the FDA is trying to have data restricted for 55 years with a slow drip of release. It would be all too apparent that the data used to determine the approval of these vaccines was flawed and fatal. Let’s look at one more data set for each of the above vaccines. Take a look at how many people have been “recovered.” Sure, they can tell you these symptoms are mild, non-life-threatening, worth the risk. But let’s take a look. Notice how many have been fatal, how many are in the process of recovering/resolving (that could take a lifetime!) and how many are considered not recovered/not resolved or resolved/recovered with sequelae.

A chart displaying outcomes to Astrazeneca COVID vaccine reactions

A chart showing the outcomes to Janssen COVID vaccine reactions

A chart showing the outcomes to reactions to the Moderna COVID vaccine

A chart showing the outcomes to the Pfizer covid vaccine reactions

Why are we trading an acute infection in which over 99% of people would recover with chronic disease and conditions that we have no idea if people will recover from these vaccine reactions? Notice the charts again. Not recovered/not resolved; recovering/resolving; recovered with sequelae, unknown, not specified. We have to know that those numbers could lead to life-long issues. According to the NIH, with sequelae means:

One of the possible results of an adverse event outcome where the subject recuperated but retained pathological conditions resulting from the prior disease or injury.5

Don’t be fooled to believe that recovered/resolved with sequelae means that a person is recovered. They have lasting effects. Ask that person if they believe they are recovered.

It’s time to get loud with your governments and elected. Listen to the media. They are trying to get everyone ramped up and hyped up in a frenzy with the omicron variant so that they can easily impose more restrictions. In fact, how many people do you know who will easily, go willingly either to get another booster or lockdown? Educate yourself! Don’t be one of them.

Stand up. Let them know that you know this vaccine was manufactured for a variant long gone. If they are trying to tell us that there are so many mutations that they don’t know if the vaccine will offer protection, why are they endorsing the same vaccine as a booster? It doesn’t make sense. This could be game over; but only if we call their bluff and refuse to play by their rules.

And I can’t help but ask, once again, with all of this data…how did Pfizer get the approval?